NWCDN Members regularly post articles and summary judgements in workers’ compensations law in your state.
Select a state from the dropdown menu below to scroll through the state specific archives for updates and opinions on various workers’ compensation laws in your state.
Contact information for NWCDN members is also located on the state specific links in the event you have additional questions or your company is seeking a workers’ compensation lawyer in your state.
Like a bad penny, the Texas Legislature returns to Austin, our home town, on
January 14, and legislators already are filing bills that would significantly
alter the workers’ compensation scheme.
At least one of those bills -- SB 423 -- could upend the dispute resolution
process as we know it. Other bills would make less drastic, but still
significant, changes.
Virtual hearings
SB 423 would require the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’
Compensation (DWC) to conduct contested case hearings by telephone or
videoconference whenever the parties “mutually agree” to proceed in that
manner. This would mark a significant departure from DWC’s current practice, in
which parties are required to appear in person for nearly all contested cases
hearings.
The bill was authored by Senator Sarah Eckhardt, a lawyer and Democrat
representing Travis County. It appears generally consistent with a legislative
recommendation from DWC. As we reported last month, DWC has issued its Biennial Report to the 89th
Legislature in which, among other things, it recommended that the
legislature amend the Labor Code “to allow contested case hearings . . . by
videoconference if all parties agree to that format.”
DWC Commissioner Jeff Nelson has said that one reason for DWC’s recommendation
was to help shape a bill that appeared inevitable anyway. “[T]hat bill in one
version or another has been filed the past three sessions by parties that
weren’t us,” Nelson told lawyers at the Texas Bar Advanced Workers’
Compensation Law Seminar in August, emphasizing that a legislative change
should require both parties to agree to a virtual hearing. “Some of those
allowed the claimant to have total say on if it was going to be virtual or not
. . . [w]e had to work like crazy last session to rein in a lot of those bills
and to keep [them] somewhat reasonable.”
But the introduced version of SB 423 does not appear to contain everything that
DWC would like to see in it. Specifically, it does not contain a provision for
DWC to override the will of the parties and conduct a hearing by
videoconference even when the parties desire to proceed in person. Nelson
told lawyers at the August seminar that DWC maintains a “zero tolerance list”
of injured workers “who are combative and threatening” and DWC would like
authority to conduct a hearing by videoconference when one of the parties is a
worker on the list.
Mandatory comp for construction workers
SB 338 and its companion, HB 875, as well as HB 480, would make workers’
compensation insurance coverage mandatory for workers in the construction
industry. They would amend Labor Code section 406.096 to provide that a
construction contractor or subcontractor “shall provide workers’ compensation
insurance coverage for each employee.”
Cost-of-living adjustments for death benefit payments
HB 1292 would amend Labor Code section 408.181 to provide that the amount of a
death benefit must be adjusted each year, as necessary, to reflect inflation.
The change would apply only to claims based on an injury occurring after the
effective date of the change and it would require insurance carriers to
re-compute the amount of a death benefit each year. The amount of the
adjustment would equal the percentage increase, if any, used by the United
States Social Security Administration to provide cost-of-living adjustment for
social security payments.
First responders - Presumption of compensability of infertility
SB 454 would create a presumption that a firefighter or emergency medical
technician suffering from infertility is presumed to have developed the
infertility during the course and scope of employment.
Designated Doctor exams and assignment of IR by telemedicine
HB 1066 would amend Labor Code section 408.0041, pertaining to Designated
Doctor examinations, to allow DWC to order a Designated Doctor to conduct an
examination by telemedicine if DWC determines that conducting the exam in that
manner “is necessary to ensure access to a timely examination by a qualified
doctor.” It would require a health care professional to be physically present
in the room with the employee to assist with the examination and administer any
necessary testing.
HB 1066 also would add new Labor Code section 408.1231 to allow a doctor to
certify maximum medical improvement and assign an impairment rating by
telemedicine for many injuries. It would require a health care professional to
be physically present in the room with the employee to assist with the
examination and administer any necessary testing unless the certifying doctor
determines that the employee (1) is not at MMI or (2) has no possibility of
impairment.
Copyright 2025, Stone
Loughlin & Swanson, LLP