NWCDN Members regularly post articles and summary judgements in workers’ compensations law in your state.
Select a state from the dropdown menu below to scroll through the state specific archives for updates and opinions on various workers’ compensation laws in your state.
Contact information for NWCDN members is also located on the state specific links in the event you have additional questions or your company is seeking a workers’ compensation lawyer in your state.
In
another case, the Department again accepted the opinion of a claimant’s
treating doctor over the opinion of Employer’s and Insurer’s expert to find
that a work injury was a major contributing cause of Claimant Daniel Jensen’s
shoulder arthritis — despite evidence that Jensen’s shoulder arthritis pre-existed
the work injury. Jensen injured his right shoulder on April 15, 2022, while
throwing heavy straps during his employment with NexGen. Upon throwing the
straps, Jensen reported a popping in his right shoulder followed by pain.
Jensen was diagnosed with a rotator cuff tear in his right shoulder and
underwent rotator cuff repair surgery in June 2022. Employer and Insurer paid
for that surgery. However, during the rotator cuff repair surgery, it was
determined that Jensen had chondromalacia and arthritis in his right shoulder
that pre-existed the work injury.
Jensen
initially felt relief from his symptoms for several months after the rotator
cuff repair surgery. However, by early 2023, he began to experience significant
pain, stiffness, and loss of right shoulder function which persisted over time.
Jensen
submitted the opinion of his treating orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Jason Hurd, who
concluded that the work injury caused a permanent aggravation of Jensen’s pre‑existing
shoulder arthritis and therefore Jensen’s arthritic shoulder was compensable.
Employer and Insurer submitted the opinion of its IME doctor, Dr. Edward Kelly,
another orthopedic surgeon, who agreed with much of Dr. Hurd’s testimony.
However, Dr. Kelly ultimately believed the work injury only caused a temporary
aggravation of Jensen’s underlying degenerative shoulder disease. Dr. Kelly
opined that because Jensen had experienced temporary relief after his rotator
cuff repair surgery, Jensen’s right shoulder issues were likely caused by his
underlying degenerative arthritis rather than the work injury.
The
Department, however, accepted the testimony of Jensen’s treating provider that
the work injury was a major contributing cause of Jensen’s shoulder
degeneration despite evidence that Jensen’s arthritis predated the work injury.
In siding with Jensen, the Department gave special weight to the finding that Jensen’s
degenerative shoulder disease was asymptomatic until sometime after the work
injury. Employer and Insurer should be aware that a work injury may still be
considered a major contributing cause of a claimant’s pre‑existing condition if
there is expert testimony that the work injury caused a permanent aggravation
of that pre‑existing condition.