| 
  | 
    | | | We are
          pleased to announce that four of our attorneys: Matt Hoffman, John
          Land, Dave Marello, and Brian Schaedler have been elected as partners
          in the firm, effective January 1, 2022.
 Matt has been practicing workers'
          compensation defense since he was admitted to New York Bar in 2014.
          He is expert in appellate practice and, notably, he successfully
          argued O'Donnell v Erie County,
          35 N.Y.3d 14 (2020) before the New York Court of Appeals, reaffirming
          the obligation of partially disabled injured workers to demonstrate a
          nexus between their post-retirement reduction in earnings and their
          disability. Matt is also an adjunct professor at the University at
          Buffalo Law School where he teaches a course on appellate advocacy.
 
 He is a member of the Erie County and New York State Bar
          Associations. Matt is resident in our Buffalo office.
 
 John has also been practicing
          workers' compensation defense since his admission to the bar in 2015,
          following his graduation, summa cum laude, from
          the State University of New York at Buffalo Law School in 2014. While
          in law school, John won “Best Oralist” at the Midwest Super Regional
          Round of the Phillip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court
          Competition in February 2014. John's professional interests cover
          every aspect of workers' compensation claims from initial controversy
          to appellate court. He has also defended employers against illegal
          employment claims under WCL §120.
 
 He is a member of the Erie County and New York State Bar Associations.
          John is resident in our Buffalo office.
 
 Dave has been practicing law with
          Hamberger & Weiss LLP since his admission to the New York Bar in
          2015. In addition to general workers' compensation litigation, Dave
          has developed a sub-specialty in representing our clients’ interests
          in third party actions before State Supreme Court and the Court of
          Claims. He also handles Loss Transfer arbitration hearings for our
          clients.
 
 Dave is an Erie County native. Outside of the office, Dave enjoys
          playing sports and working on his golf game. He is a member of the
          Erie County Bar Association and is resident in our Buffalo office.
 
 Brian is
          also a graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo Law
          School, where he not only served as a Publications Editor on the Buffalo Law Review, but graduated
          in 2014 with the honor of three separate awards: the Robert J.
          Connelly Trial Technique Award, the American Bar Association and the
          Bureau of National Affairs Award for Excellence in the Study of
          Health Law, and the Harold A. Dautch Memorial Scholarship Award for Academic
          Excellence. Brian is an expert litigator and has successfully
          defended our clients throughout the thousands of hearings and
          depositions he has handled.
 
 When not in hearings, Brian can be found at the gym, playing sports,
          or watching the Buffalo Bills or Sabres. Brian is a member of the New
          York State Bar Association and is resident in our Rochester office.
 
 | 
 | 
   | | | Bram Lehman Joins
            H&W LLP as Special Counsel  | 
 | 
 | 
   | | We are
          pleased to welcome Bram
          Lehman to
          the firm, who joined us as Special Counsel in December 2021. Bram has
          more than 30 years of experience in New York workers’ compensation.
          He was most recently a partner in the firm of Bond, McDonald, &
          Lehman in Geneva, NY where he represented claimants for 20 years.
          Bram graduated cum laude from Syracuse Law School in
          1991, where he was an editor of the Syracuse Law Review.
          He began his workers’ compensation career in 1993 at the Syracuse
          defense firm Mackenzie, Smith, Lewis, Michel, and Hughes, where he
          represented a wide range of carriers, third party administrators and
          self- insured employers.  He then became a partner at another
          Syracuse defense firm, Whyland & Richmond, LLP, where he practiced
          until 2000. Bram was a Geneva City Court Judge from 2007 until
          2014. He is a member of the New York State Bar Association and is
          resident in our Rochester office. | 
 | 
   | | | Practice Tips Regarding
            the 130 Week PPD Credit/MMI "Safety Valve" Provision | 
 | 
 | 
   | | In 2017 the
          workers’ compensation law was amended to allow carriers to take
          credit for temporary disability payments paid to a claimant beyond
          130 weeks (2.5 years) from the date of accident or disablement
          against that claimant’s maximum benefit weeks from a permanent
          partial disability award under §15(3)(w). This rule applies to all
          injuries with dates of accident or disability after April 9,
          2017. However, the credit only applies if there was no
          intervening finding that the claimant was not at maximum medical
          improvement (“MMI”). Now that we are well past 130 weeks from
          April 9, 2017, this provision has become increasingly relevant and we
          have encountered a few different issues we want our clients to be
          aware of. 
 1)        
          The amendment applies as a matter of law:
 
 Our firm maintains, and the Board thus far seems to agree, that the
          amendment applies as a matter of law.  In other words, there is
          no need for the carrier to specifically note its entitlement to the
          credit at the time classification is decided. We have seen some cases
          where the claimant's bar disputes this and alleges that the existence
          of a credit must have been raised at the time of permanency. We are
          unaware of any precedent in support of this position. Should you
          receive any ruling from the Board finding the carrier is not entitled
          to a credit against the cap on the basis that it was not raised at
          permanency, please let us know.
 
 2)        
          All weeks in which payments were made after 130 weeks from the date
          of accident/disablement count towards the credit
 
 We have heard some argument that the carrier is only entitled to a
          credit after 130 weeks of payments have been made, rather than the
          credit applying for any benefits paid after 130 weeks have passed
          from the date of injury. We disagree with this argument. The statute
          states that whenever the carrier has provided compensation beyond 130
          weeks from the date of accident, it gets a credit for those payment
          weeks. It says nothing about an obligation to have paid 130 weeks of compensation.
           Furthermore, Board
          Subject Number 046-936 says “The reforms … provide
          a credit for periods of temporary disability that extend beyond 2.5
          years (130 weeks) from the date of injury. Insurance carriers may
          receive a credit against the maximum benefits payable for permanent
          partial disability for any periods of temporary disability paid
          beyond the 2.5 years (130 weeks).”  This language makes no claim
          that 130 weeks of benefits must be paid for the credit to
          apply.
 
 Accordingly, should you receive any decision where a WCLJ finds you
          are not entitled to credit weeks on the basis that they did not begin
          to accrue until 130 weeks of temporary benefits had been paid, please
          let us know.
 
 3)        
          Avoid MMI litigation when the outcome is uncertain
 
 To paraphrase Sun-Tzu, “never enter into any battle you have not
          already won.” As noted above, the credit for temporary benefits
          disappears if there is a no MMI determination before permanency is
          ultimately found. Thankfully, this provision is worded narrowly. For
          the credit to be forfeit, 1) permanency must be at issue; 2) the
          claimant must have produced medical evidence he is not at MMI; 3) the
          carrier must have had the chance to secure an opinion on the
          question; and 4) the Board must have decided that the claimant is not
          at MMI.
 
 Therefore, it is wise to avoid litigating the issue if it does not
          seem likely the carrier will prevail.  Better to accept the
          opinion of a claimant’s doctor that he is not at MMI for the time
          being, secure in the knowledge that the benefits you are paying now
          will ultimately act as a credit, rather than litigate and lose not
          only the issue of MMI, but the availability of the credit. In cases
          where the Board sets the matter down for permanency on its own
          motion, and there is an opinion from claimant's doctor that he is not
          at MMI, it may be prudent to consider accepting that opinion, unless
          there is some obvious factual or legal deficiency.  We can then
          argue that the credit was not forfeit on the basis that none of the latter
          three events occurred.
 
 We anticipate that the claimant's bar may ultimately argue for such
          cases to be disqualified from the credit, but we are optimistic about
          our position given the language of the statute.
 | 
 | 
   | | | Governor Hochul Signs
            Workers' Compensation Bills at end of 2021 | 
 | 
 | 
   | | A number of
          workers' compensation bills were signed into law by New York Governor
          Kathy Hochul to close out 2021. The first creates a schedule for attorney fees and removes much of the
          Board’s discretion regarding same. The new law adds subdivisions 2
          and 3 to WCL §24 and provides that the Board “shall” approve fee
          applications “in an amount commensurate with the services rendered
          and the amount of compensation awarded, having due regard for the
          financial state of the claimant” in accordance with the following
          schedule:
 (a) One third of a week’s compensation for continuing payments
 (b) 15% of a retroactive award increase over prior payments
 (c) 15% of SLU and SFD awards less prior payments
 (d) 15% of PTD and PPD classification awards less prior payments,
          plus a sum equaling 15 weeks of the weekly rate
 (e) 15% of Death awards less prior payments, plus 15 weeks at the
          weekly rate
 (f) 15% of Section 32 Settlement award and waiver of any prior fees
          awarded but not accrued.
 
 Despite stating that fees shall be "commensurate with services
          rendered," the amendment seems to indicate that the Board must
          award fees in accordance with this schedule, regardless of the amount
          of work the attorney performed. The fact that the language provides that
          the Board “shall” award in accordance with the schedule implies that
          the Board has little discretion on fees. The Governor’s signing
          memorandum references some technical changes to the law, which are
          now the subject of Senate
          Bill S7762, currently working its way through the
          legislature. This bill will push the effective date for the attorney
          fee schedule to 1/1/23. Additionally, the bill will require written
          fee applications for fees more than $1,000.00. Significantly, the
          bill states that benefits allocated towards future medical expenses
          in Section 32 agreement shall not be included in the calculation of
          the fee. Senate Bill S7762 has been passed by both the Senate and the
          Assembly. Thus, the bill will presumably be signed by the Governor in
          the near future.
 
 The next bill, signed on 12/23/21, concerns the Uninsured Employers Fund
          (UEF) and
          adds a new subdivision 6-a to WCL §26-a. The new subdivision provides
          that in the event the Board is unable to identify the responsible
          insurance carrier for an employer within ten days of filing of a new
          claim, it shall “appoint” the UEF as the insurance carrier “until
          such time as the responsible insurance carrier is determined.” At the
          time she signed the bill, the Governor announced that she had reached
          an agreement with the legislature to amend the bill to allow thirty
          days from claim filing for appointment of the UEF as carrier. The
          amendment further provides that “Upon such appointment, the UEF shall immediately commence
          payments and provide medical care…” (emphasis added). It remains to
          be seen just how immediate the UEF’s payments will be. Arguably, this
          legislation denies the UEF the opportunity to controvert a claim on
          basic ANCR issues. The amendment takes effect sixty days after
          signing (February 20, 2022) and applies only to claims filed on and
          after that date.
 
 The bill most applauded by attorneys, signed on 12/22/21, takes away
          the Board’s power to deny applications for Board review and Rebuttals
          to same based on technical defects in the
          RB–89 and RB–89.1 cover sheets. The bill adds a new
          Sec. 23-a to the WCL which provides that notwithstanding Board Rule
          300.13(b) and Board Subject Nos. “a mistake, omission, defect and/or
          other irregularity in a coversheet accompanying” an Application for
          Board Review, Application for Full Board Review, or Rebuttal shall
          not be grounds for denial of such Application or Rebuttal. The Board
          is to “permit any such mistake, omission, defect and/or irregularity
          to be corrected within twenty days of written notice by the board” of
          same, or "if a substantial right of either the party filing the
          application or party filing the rebuttal is not prejudiced, such
          mistake, omission, defect and/or irregularity shall be disregarded.”
 WCL §23-a takes effect immediately but does not apply to previously
          denied Applications or Rebuttals.
 
 Other bills signed near the end of 2021 include S.1022-A, which added
          a new WCL §17-a to the statute, requiring the Board to translate all documents and
          forms used by or issued to injured employees in the 10 most common
          non-English languages spoken in New York State. The
          new law also requires the Board to provide interpretation services to
          injured employees and to publish a "language access plan"
          as well as a point a "language access coordinator." The new
          law is effective 3/22/22.
 
 Finally, in October 2021, the Governor signed the "Nigro
          Act" named for Anthony Nigro, a bus mechanic who died in 2012 of
          lung cancer from exposure to diesel exhaust. This law creates a new
          WCL §16-a that provides a one time, one year
          opportunity to file a death benefit claim for any cancer due to
          exposure to diesel exhaust that otherwise would
          be disallowed by the timely claim filing or timely notice defenses.
          The one-year window begins on 10/29/21 and ends on 10/28/22.
 
 Please contact our partner Ron
          Weiss with
          any questions about the above legislation.
 | 
 | 
     | | Hamberger
          & Weiss LLP - Buffalo Office700 Main Place
          Tower
 350 Main
          Street
 Buffalo, NY
          14202
 716-852-5200
 buffalo@hwcomp.com
 
 Hamberger
          & Weiss LLP - Rochester Office
 1 South
          Washington Street
 Suite 500
 Rochester, NY
          14614
 585-262-6390
 rochester@hwcomp.com
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 |