State News : New Jersey

NWCDN is a network of law firms dedicated to protecting employers in workers’ compensation claims.

NWCDN Members regularly post articles and summary judgements in workers’ compensations law in your state.  

Select a state from the dropdown menu below to scroll through the state specific archives for updates and opinions on various workers’ compensation laws in your state.

Contact information for NWCDN members is also located on the state specific links in the event you have additional questions or your company is seeking a workers’ compensation lawyer in your state.

New Jersey



Adjusters and employers familiar with other state workers’ compensation laws are often surprised to find out that the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act contains no statute requiring employers to pay for transportation costs to get employees to medical appointments and no mileage reimbursement provision.  

When an employer requires an injured worker who has moved out of state to come back to New Jersey for an independent medical examination, the employer does not have to pay for airfare, reimburse costs of travel, or reimburse mileage.

Yet there are situations where it may make good sense for employers to consider providing transportation. One such situation occurs when there is an offer of light duty.  As readers well know, the Harbatuk case stands for the proposition that an employer can terminate temporary disability benefits on an offer of light duty if the injured employee refuses the light duty offer.  Suppose the injured employee is more than willing to accept the light duty offer, but the authorized treating doctor will not permit the injured worker to drive a car as a result of the work injury?   Should the employer refuse to pay temporary disability benefits when the employee does not appear for the light duty assignment?

This situation happens quite frequently because many injuries lead to restrictions on driving following surgery or the employee may be taking authorized prescription medications that negate driving.  When faced with this issue, most Judges of Compensation will not endorse the termination of temporary disability benefits when an employee wants to come back to work light duty but cannot due to a restriction against driving imposed by the treating doctor.  Judges do not consider this to be a refusal to perform light duty, so it may make sense in this situation to provide some means of transportation.

Distance is often the key variable. Many injured workers have long drives to work where no public transportation is available.  Some employers will offer to have a fellow employee pick up the injured worker and drive the injured worker to the light duty assignment.  In rare situations, employers may even provide an Uber or Lyft driver.  Still other employers faced with this dilemma will simply continue to pay temporary disability benefits until the injured worker reaches maximal medical improvement or can return to driving.  New Jersey is a state where temporary disability benefits end at MMI or return to work full duty, whichever is earlier.

Another transportation issue arises when the injured worker cannot get to physical therapy or make treating appointments because of a driving restriction placed on the worker by the authorized physician.  Again, there is no case law on this issue, nor any statute that addresses it.  Employers will often come up with a creative solution because they know that if the employee cannot get to treatment or therapy, the recovery period will be lengthened.  

Thus far we have discussed cases involving driving restrictions.  But there is a large contingent of New Jersey workers who do not own cars and only get to work through employer provided transportation.  When an injury occurs to such an employee, there may be no way to get to the office of the treating doctor.  Some employers provide transportation in this situation.  It is also worth noting that there are a few occupational health facilities and physicians that provide transportation, picking the employee up for treatment and returning the employee to his or her residence. This is an important service that employers should bear in mind. 

The lesson in all of this is that the absence of a statutory provision on transportation has not prevented New Jersey employers from creating practical solutions to challenges in getting employees to work and to medical appointments.


John H. Geaney, Esq., is an Executive Committee Member and a Shareholder in Capehart Scatchard's Workers’ Compensation Group.  Mr. Geaney concentrates his practice in the representation of employers, self-insured companies, third-party administrators, and insurance carriers in workers’ compensation, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Family and Medical Leave Act. Should you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Mr. Geaney at 856.914.2063 or by e‑mail at