State News : New Jersey

NWCDN is a network of law firms dedicated to protecting employers in workers’ compensation claims.


NWCDN Members regularly post articles and summary judgements in workers’ compensations law in your state.  


Select a state from the dropdown menu below to scroll through the state specific archives for updates and opinions on various workers’ compensation laws in your state.


Contact information for NWCDN members is also located on the state specific links in the event you have additional questions or your company is seeking a workers’ compensation lawyer in your state.


New Jersey

CAPEHART SCATCHARD

  856-235-2786

Jennifer Kocanowski, a member of the Finderne Fire Department in the Township of Bridgewater, was injured in March 2015 while carrying equipment in response to a multi-alarm fire.  She fractured her fibula, tore ligaments in her ankle, and injured her back.

Prior to the injury, Kocanowski had not worked for over a year.  She had previously worked in 2013 as a nanny and a home health aide but took a six month leave from volunteering to care for her ill mother after her father’s death.  She returned to volunteer firefighting in July 2014.  However, she did not resume her prior outside employment. Her injury left her with permanent partial impairment.

The issue presented in this case was whether the Township owed Kocanowski temporary disability benefits following her injury in March 2015.  Kocanowski argued that she was entitled to temporary disability benefits based on the maximum rate set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-75, the provision dealing with rates for volunteer firefighters and EMTs. The Township argued that she was not entitled to temporary disability benefits because she had no lost wage to replace.  The Judge of Compensation and the Appellate Division both held that Kocanowski was not entitled to temporary disability benefits at all since she had not worked in over a year prior to her injury and had no offer of employment.

The New Jersey Supreme Court issued its decision on February 19, 2019.  The decision focused on the legislative intent to encourage volunteerism in passing N.J.S.A. 34:15-75.  This statute reads:

Compensation for injury and death, either or both, of any volunteer fireman . . . (or) emergency management volunteer doing emergency management service . . . shall:

1.      Be based upon a weekly salary or compensation conclusively presumed to be received by such person in an amount sufficient to entitle him (or her) or, in the event of his (or her) death, his (or her) dependents, to receive the maximum compensation by this chapter authorized. . .”

The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Appellate Division:  “As such, we find N.J.S.A. 34:15-75 authorizes all volunteer firefighters injured in the course of performing their duties to receive the maximum compensation permitted, regardless of their outside employment status at the time of the injury.”

The Court rejected the argument of the defense that all claims for lost wages must meet the test set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-38.  Defense argued that the words “by this chapter authorized” at the end of N.J.S.A. 34:15-75 refers to the entire workers’ compensation statute.  The provision dealing with temporary disability benefits is N.J.S.A. 34:15-38.  That section requires temporary disability benefits be paid from the day the employee is first unable to work due to the accident up to the first working day that the employee is able to resume work.  Defense suggested that this petitioner could not meet the test in N.J.S.A 34:15-38 because she had no work.

The Court responded by pointing out the prior to the passage of N.J.S.A. 34:15-75 in 1952, volunteer firefighters who were unemployed were entitled to temporary disability benefits even though N.J.S.A. 34:15-38 existed.  The rules for all other employees were not applied to volunteers.  In essence, the Court ruled that the New Jersey Legislature clearly never intended statutory volunteers to be subject to the law that applies to all other employees in New Jersey.  The reason for this exemption was to encourage volunteerism.

The Court’s decision failed to address one important question raised in oral argument, namely whether this ruling would mean that an 18-year-old high school volunteer firefighter injured in 2019 with no outside employment would be entitled to $921 per week while receiving authorized treatment and attending full-time high school classes.  The decision in Kocanowski suggests that this high school volunteer must be paid $921 per week while actively treating until reaching maximal medical improvement, notwithstanding the obvious windfall to the student and the cost to the municipality.

 

-----------------

John H. Geaney, Esq., is an Executive Committee Member and a Shareholder in Capehart Scatchard's Workers’ Compensation Group.  Mr. Geaney concentrates his practice in the representation of employers, self-insured companies, third-party administrators, and insurance carriers in workers’ compensation, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Family and Medical Leave Act. Should you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Mr. Geaney at 856.914.2063 or by e‑mail at jgeaney@capehart.com.