NWCDN Members regularly post articles and summary judgements in workers’ compensations law in your state.
Select a state from the dropdown menu below to scroll through the state specific archives for updates and opinions on various workers’ compensation laws in your state.
Contact information for NWCDN members is also located on the state specific links in the event you have additional questions or your company is seeking a workers’ compensation lawyer in your state.
A number of prominent Medicare experts disseminated Legal Alerts last week to the effect that changes may be occurring with respect to the requirements for CMS to approve zero allocations. These changes would spell bad news in New Jersey for employers who want to settle disputed cases on a Section 20 basis. According to Martin Cassavoy of ISO Claims Partners in his October 27, 2016 News Alert, the Workers’ Compensation Review Contractor (WCRC) has stated that CMS will soon require the following for approval of a zero allocation:
The case or the body part in question has been denied throughout the case;
There has been no medical or indemnity payment for the denied case or body part; and
There is either a finding from a hearing by the Judge of Compensation relieving the carrier of liability or a report from the treating physician recommending no future treatment.
No official enactment of these requirements has occurred to date, but if this is the new approach that CMS is going to adopt, it will be very hard for employers to obtain zero set aside allocations in New Jersey and other states. Compensation judges in New Jersey have enormous caseloads. They have not historically been actively involved in ruling on Medicare issues. If a judge now has to determine that no compensable workers’ compensation claim exists, that will create a long back-up of trials on cases that were formerly resolved simply and efficiently by way of Section 20 settlements.
Attorney Heather Schwartz Sanderson, Esq., Chief Legal Officer for Franco Signor, LLC., wrote in her Alert: “Our recommendation has always been where the workers’ compensation claim is completely denied, no medicals have been paid, and the claim is settling on a compromise basis CMS approval is not recommended.” Ms. Sanderson’s statement makes sense since Medicare would have been and would continue to be the primary payor in this situation. Her reasoning is persuasive and should be considered by employers. She argues that there should be no allocation for future medical care in the above situation.
Our office will continue to update clients if these changes are adopted by CMS. Thanks to Marita Tortorelli, Assistant Vice President of PMA Insurance Companies for bringing this issue to the undersigned’s attention.
------------------
John H. Geaney, Esq., is an Executive Committee Member and a Shareholder in Capehart Scatchard's Workers’ Compensation Group. Mr. Geaney concentrates his practice in the representation of employers, self-insured companies, third-party administrators, and insurance carriers in workers’ compensation, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Family and Medical Leave Act. Should you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Mr. Geaney at 856.914.2063 or by e‑mail at jgeaney@capehart.com.