State News : Illinois

NWCDN is a network of law firms dedicated to protecting employers in workers’ compensation claims.


NWCDN Members regularly post articles and summary judgements in workers’ compensations law in your state.  


Select a state from the dropdown menu below to scroll through the state specific archives for updates and opinions on various workers’ compensation laws in your state.


Contact information for NWCDN members is also located on the state specific links in the event you have additional questions or your company is seeking a workers’ compensation lawyer in your state.


Illinois

RUSIN LAW, LTD

  312-454-6166

by: Kisa P. Sthankiya

On May 31, 2026, the Illinois General Assembly passed HB5228. The bill amends several provisions of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act. The legislation faced significant opposition from employer and business interests during the legislative process.

The most notable changes are the amendments to Sections 12 and 8.7. Governor JB Pritzker has 60 days to approve, sign, or veto the bill. At this time, it appears the bill will be enacted into law.

I. Amendment to Section 12 of the Illinois Workers' Compensation Act

  • If an employer chooses to obtain an independent medical examination/opinion regarding the reasonableness and necessity of treatment instead of utilizing the utilization review process, the reviewing medical practitioner must issue the examination report within 90 days.  This does not appear to apply to independent medical examination opinions regarding causation.
  • The 90-day period begins when the employer receives the medical records from the treating provider requesting the treatment.
  • The employer must exercise due diligence in obtaining those records from the treating provider.
  • The reviewing practitioner must be board certified in the same specialty as the employee's treating health care professional.
    • For example, if the treating physician is an orthopedic surgeon, the reviewing physician must also be board certified in orthopedic surgery.
  • The examination report must be provided to:
    • the employee;
    • the employee's representative (such as an attorney); and
    • the treating health care professional.

Consequences for Missing the 90-Day Deadline

If the employer fails to comply with these requirements after receiving the necessary medical records:

  • A rebuttable presumption arises that the employer is responsible for additional penalties and attorney’s fees under Sections 16 and 19(l) of the Act.
  • A rebuttable presumption means the employer is presumed liable unless it can present some evidence to overcome that presumption.

What Conduct Is Covered?

The provision applies to:

  1. Failure to authorize or approve treatment; and
  2. Failure to pay for medical treatment.

II. Utilization Review – Section 8.7

The bill substantially revises utilization review requirements and significantly limits who may conduct reviews and issue adverse determinations.

  • Only licensed health care professionals may determine whether a medical service is medically necessary during utilization review.
  • If the treatment was recommended or provided by a physician, any denial or other adverse determination must be made by a physician.
  • The reviewing physician must:
    1. Hold a current, unrestricted medical license in the United States;
    2. Be board certified in the specialty relevant to the treatment being reviewed; and
    3. Have actual experience treating and managing patients with the same condition or disease involved in the request.
  • A licensed health care professional may deny a request from another provider only if the reviewer is licensed in the same profession as the provider who submitted the request.
    • For example, a treatment request submitted by an orthopedic surgeon must be reviewed by a physician who is board certified in orthopedic surgery.

III. Burial Benefit

The bill increases the statutory burial benefit under Section 7(f) from $8,000 to $10,000.

IV. Funding for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission

The bill establishes a pro rata surcharge on insurance carriers to achieve an annual funding target for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission.

V. State Licensure Compliance

The bill requires State-licensed entities to comply with Illinois workers’ compensation insurance requirements.

Employer Considerations and Recommended Next Steps

The amendments to Sections 12 and 8.7 represent some of the most significant changes to Illinois workers’ compensation claims administration in recent years and are likely to have a substantial impact on approval of medical treatment.

Employers should begin evaluating their workers’ compensation programs now to ensure compliance with the new requirements if the bill becomes law. Failure to comply with these provisions may increase exposure to penalties, adverse presumptions, and challenges to treatment denials.

We will continue to monitor HB5228 as it moves to Governor Pritzker for consideration and will provide updates regarding enactment, effective dates, and implementation issues. If you have questions regarding these amendments or their impact on your workers’ compensation program, please contact any attorney in our office. We would be pleased to discuss the practical implications of the legislation and assist with any questions or concerns.

On May 31, 2026, the Illinois General Assembly passed HB5228. The bill amends several provisions of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act. The legislation faced significant opposition from employer and business interests during the legislative process.

The most notable changes are the amendments to Sections 12 and 8.7. Governor JB Pritzker has 60 days to approve, sign, or veto the bill. At this time, it appears the bill will be enacted into law.

I. Amendment to Section 12 of the Illinois Workers' Compensation Act

  • If an employer chooses to obtain an independent medical examination/opinion regarding the reasonableness and necessity of treatment instead of utilizing the utilization review process, the reviewing medical practitioner must issue the examination report within 90 days.  This does not appear to apply to independent medical examination opinions regarding causation.
  • The 90-day period begins when the employer receives the medical records from the treating provider requesting the treatment.
  • The employer must exercise due diligence in obtaining those records from the treating provider.
  • The reviewing practitioner must be board certified in the same specialty as the employee's treating health care professional.
    • For example, if the treating physician is an orthopedic surgeon, the reviewing physician must also be board certified in orthopedic surgery.
  • The examination report must be provided to:
    • the employee;
    • the employee's representative (such as an attorney); and
    • the treating health care professional.

Consequences for Missing the 90-Day Deadline

If the employer fails to comply with these requirements after receiving the necessary medical records:

  • A rebuttable presumption arises that the employer is responsible for additional penalties and attorney’s fees under Sections 16 and 19(l) of the Act.
  • A rebuttable presumption means the employer is presumed liable unless it can present some evidence to overcome that presumption.

What Conduct Is Covered?

The provision applies to:

  1. Failure to authorize or approve treatment; and
  2. Failure to pay for medical treatment.

II. Utilization Review – Section 8.7

The bill substantially revises utilization review requirements and significantly limits who may conduct reviews and issue adverse determinations.

  • Only licensed health care professionals may determine whether a medical service is medically necessary during utilization review.
  • If the treatment was recommended or provided by a physician, any denial or other adverse determination must be made by a physician.
  • The reviewing physician must:
    1. Hold a current, unrestricted medical license in the United States;
    2. Be board certified in the specialty relevant to the treatment being reviewed; and
    3. Have actual experience treating and managing patients with the same condition or disease involved in the request.
  • A licensed health care professional may deny a request from another provider only if the reviewer is licensed in the same profession as the provider who submitted the request.
    • For example, a treatment request submitted by an orthopedic surgeon must be reviewed by a physician who is board certified in orthopedic surgery.

III. Burial Benefit

The bill increases the statutory burial benefit under Section 7(f) from $8,000 to $10,000.

IV. Funding for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission

The bill establishes a pro rata surcharge on insurance carriers to achieve an annual funding target for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission.

V. State Licensure Compliance

The bill requires State-licensed entities to comply with Illinois workers’ compensation insurance requirements.

Employer Considerations and Recommended Next Steps

The amendments to Sections 12 and 8.7 represent some of the most significant changes to Illinois workers’ compensation claims administration in recent years and are likely to have a substantial impact on approval of medical treatment.

Employers should begin evaluating their workers’ compensation programs now to ensure compliance with the new requirements if the bill becomes law. Failure to comply with these provisions may increase exposure to penalties, adverse presumptions, and challenges to treatment denials.

We will continue to monitor HB5228 as it moves to Governor Pritzker for consideration and will provide updates regarding enactment, effective dates, and implementation issues. If you have questions regarding these amendments or their impact on your workers’ compensation program, please feel free to contact us.